The partisans of centralization in Europe are wont to maintain that the
government can administer the affairs of each locality better than the citizens
could do it for themselves: this may be true, when the central power is
enlightened, and the local authorities are ignorant; when it is alert, and they
are slow; when it is accustomed to act, and they to obey. Indeed, it is
evident that this double tendency must augment with the increase of
centralization, and that the readiness of the one and incapacity of the others
must become more and more prominent. But I deny that it is so, when the
peolpe are as enlightenened, as awake to their interests, and as accustomed to
reflect on them, as the Americans are. I am persuaded, on the contrary,
that, in this case, the collective strength of the citizens will always conduce
more efficaciously to the public welfare than the authority of the
government.
De Tocqueville, Democracy in America
So, those for centralization distrust the people to adjudicate problems for themselves. Those for centralization of power today are liberals. Liberals thus distrust the populace. According to De Tocqueville, the enlightened public should get to decide for itself.
Isn't it ironic, then, that those who want the government to stay out of people's private lives (read: abortion) when it comes to issues of life and death, completely reverse their opinion when it comes to issues about life quality. Those same people actually want the government to intrude egregiously into our lives (read: socialized medicine).
No comments:
Post a Comment