10/23/08

Prioritizing Political Voting

I've been thinking for weeks about how to prioritize the importance of issues when voting. I mentioned some earlier posts on Denver Seminary's Lectures a few weeks ago. They weren't all that helpful because all they did was introduce the audience to the idea that poverty, social issues, and the environment matter too. Okay, so they told a conservative crowd that certain other issues (championed by the left) matter too. But, it wasn't helpful at all to me. I was left asking, "Well how do I vote exactly?" "Has the left cornered the market on perfecting how to overcome social issues?" "Are some of these issues more important than the others?" The conference didn't answer these questions at all, and thus didn't tell me anything I already didn't know. I began the quest of prioritizing my political voting for myself then.

The issue of life, the issue of the "least of these," and therefore the issue of the unborn is the most important issue from a Christian worldview
. Humans were and are made in the image of God, and therefore we should not sacrifice other things to this reality. For instance, a society or worldview that sees the environment as the most important issue would/might sacrifice basic human needs to achieve this end. Americans do eat too much, but the unborn and their unfortunate deaths matter more than the environment. A Christian is supposed to steward the environment and still care for it, but it is prioritized polititically below the life issue.

The blog, philosophical pastor, does a good job of showing that the left's political worldview bears on the issue of life, and thus prioritizes it below other things. The left isn't necessarily socialistic, but the socialistic scheme does de-value human life ultimately. I used to think it was a vain political philosophy, but now I see its opposition to a worldview that values life.

And even though I've prioritized the life issue, I shouldn't neglect my responsibilities to hold conservative leaning candidates accountable to other issues. Personally, I'd like to see conservative and pragmatic solutions to healthcare, homelessness, and social security. I don't think the left has cornered the right answer on these issues.

4 comments:

Daniel said...

Great post. The tension that I personally feel is on one side you have what you're talking about. On the other side are issues that effect me directly. Abortion does not effect me directly. Things like the economy, employment, and lack of good healthcare effect me directly.

Am I being self-centered in taking into account issues that effect me directly over issues that my worldview holds highly? I don't know, maybe. I care about abortion but the reason that people vote is because they want to see a change in their own life, that they hope the candidate they vote for can fulfill. Christians are to be altruistic but can altruism sometimes take away from more important things? I'm wondering in a rhetorical manner-- it's fine for a person to protest abortion clinics if that's what they believe in, but they can't do that if they are in the hospital and piling on debt from lack of good healthcare insurance. First things first and sometimes we just need to put ourselves first.

David Strunk said...

Interesting- your ethical dilemmas have me pondering....

I agree with you to the extent that personal righteousness issues do play a part in prioritization issues. After all, I don't want to be taxed more. But, it still falls below the life issue. I just haven't prioritized after #1.

Craig Blomberg said...

Don't underestimate the value of Ron Sider's remarks--many will never have heard anything like that in their lives before. But kudos for being well ahead of the curve! Hopefully what Dan and I said yesterday may have provided more help. And Tony Campolo might touch on some things this week--don't know his topic, but he's always great to listen to. But I'll be in Ireland. . .

David Strunk said...

Thanks Dr. Blomberg,
You are right. Most of my political philosophy now has really been constructed since being in seminary, as Bible classes and PR classes have helped shape and establish my Christian worldview convictions.

I guess that you and other profs did such a good job already that I'm ahead of the curve. I suppose the problem is, how do we make ideas such as Sider's or Chris Wright's (Mission of God) accessible to a larger audience? Is this the job of future pastors, like me?